Comments on: Sarah @Wood’s review of “The Dark Knight” http://angryweb.net/2008/06/30/sarah-woods-review-of-the-dark-knight/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sarah-woods-review-of-the-dark-knight Tue, 15 May 2012 05:04:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Mike http://angryweb.net/2008/06/30/sarah-woods-review-of-the-dark-knight/#comment-128 Mike Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:13:32 +0000 http://angryweb.wordpress.com/?p=486#comment-128 Iron Man was a stereotypical, artificial, and generic comic book movie. I mean Robert Downey Jr. was great, but that's all the movie really had going for it. The Dark Knight is just so much deeper, darker, and more interesting. The cinemotography of the city is beautiful. The pacing of the film is fast. The music is as tense as the story. I just don't see what Iron Man did that edges out Dark Knight. It doesn't matter if this movie was 90 minutes or 5 hours. As long as it was entertaining, that's all that matters. IRon Man was a guy building a suit for half the movie, and when he finally faces the main villian, it's only for 5 minutes. The Dark Knight has all these character arcs and storylines going. It's a much deeper movie overall. Iron Man was a stereotypical, artificial, and generic comic book movie. I mean Robert Downey Jr. was great, but that’s all the movie really had going for it.

The Dark Knight is just so much deeper, darker, and more interesting. The cinemotography of the city is beautiful. The pacing of the film is fast. The music is as tense as the story. I just don’t see what Iron Man did that edges out Dark Knight. It doesn’t matter if this movie was 90 minutes or 5 hours. As long as it was entertaining, that’s all that matters.

IRon Man was a guy building a suit for half the movie, and when he finally faces the main villian, it’s only for 5 minutes. The Dark Knight has all these character arcs and storylines going. It’s a much deeper movie overall.

]]>